Air Canada Case Synopsis
Page 4 of 11
airports services suppliers, is medium to high due to oversupply in the aviation industry and strict
airport regulations. The bargaining power of customers is medium to high because of low
switching cost, undifferentiated products, and readily available information. The threat of
substitution is low since flying remains the best option for those travelling long distances, as it is
both faster and safer than competing modes of transportation. Air Canada’s major competitors
are broken into two segments, one is among traditional passenger carriers, and the other is that
between transport carriers. The latter, which is fierce, centers mainly on pricing and serviceable
routes.
Competitive Environment
Traditional carriers, Transat and Cathay Pacific, and cargo carrier, WestJet are among Air
Canada’s top competitors. Transat employs a vertical integration strategy, which has been
successful in making the airline the leader in the international tourism industry (Transat: 2011
Annual Report). Its goals are achievable because of its strength in distribution and cost
management, but weakened by its lack of alliances, and industry seasonality. Another competitor,
Cathay Pacific, is currently focusing on its Asia/Pacific growth with future emphasis on
sustainable air travel (Cathay Pacific: 2012 Annual Report). The ability to offer excellent
customer service abilities, and the creation of One World alliances are among Cathay Pacific’s
capabilities. Last, WestJet, a competitor in the cargo transportation segment, is focused on
profitable growth, and partnerships with future plans to expand in an environmentally friendly
manner. WestJet believes that its success in the past will be carried into the future. Its success
was and will be achieved by the airlines ability to offer low cost fares and enthusiastic customer
service (WestJet: Investors Relations, 2013). Although, it has made a trademark of its services, it
does acknowledge the lack of premium services.